linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: add a quirk to disable FUA support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YpaHwds1zYRwua3+@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 May 2022 21:25:21 +0000
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: add a quirk to disable FUA support

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 01:53:33PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Also, this patch does nothing by itself.  Which UFS host driver(s) need this
> > quirk bit?  Can you update them to use it?  Or do they all need this, in which
> > case a quirk bit would be unnecessary?
> 
> Likewise other quick bits, using this is up to SoC or UFS vendors. I
> think that combination is up to OEMs who is building the product.

Of the UFS host drivers in the upstream kernel, which ones actually need this?

- Eric