[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39d1fa65-8e82-721c-171e-ef36bda1c561@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 23:00:18 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-debug: Make things less spammy under memory pressure
On 2022-05-31 22:51, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>
> Ratelimit the error msg to avoid flooding the console.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> ---
> kernel/dma/debug.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/debug.c b/kernel/dma/debug.c
> index f8ff598596b8..683966f0247b 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/debug.c
> @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static void add_dma_entry(struct dma_debug_entry *entry, unsigned long attrs)
>
> rc = active_cacheline_insert(entry);
> if (rc == -ENOMEM) {
> - pr_err("cacheline tracking ENOMEM, dma-debug disabled\n");
> + pr_err_ratelimited("cacheline tracking ENOMEM, dma-debug disabled\n");
> global_disable = true;
Given that it's supposed to disable itself entirely if it ever gets
here, just how spammy is it exactly?
Thanks,
Robin.
> } else if (rc == -EEXIST && !(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC)) {
> err_printk(entry->dev, entry,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists