linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V9 0/8] Use copy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Jun 2022 16:21:12 -0500
From:   michael.christie@...cle.com
To:     hch@...radead.org, stefanha@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
        mst@...hat.com, sgarzare@...hat.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, brauner@...nel.org,
        ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/8] Use copy_process in vhost layer

On 5/12/22 4:46 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> The following patches were made over Eric's tree:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git
> 
> and his kthread-cleanups-for-v5.19 branch.

Hi Eric,

Did you have more review comments for the patches or are you ok with them
now? I haven't seen any comments the last couple of postings. I've
been watching your trees, so I know you are doing cleanup/improvements
in the areas I needed help with so I know it's still on your radar, but
now I'm worried I'm missing emails/reviews from you :)

Are you also going to push the kthread-cleanups for 5.19 still or is that
going to be 5.20? I have patches that depend and/or have conflicts with
this set so I'm trying to figure out what I should be rebasing and testing
against.