lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YpfiOeglKe1w1fJb@iweiny-desk3>
Date:   Wed, 1 Jun 2022 15:03:37 -0700
From:   Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To:     Ben Widawsky <ben@...dawsk.net>
Cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 5/9] cxl/port: Find a DOE mailbox which supports CDAT

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 10:57:16AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On 22-05-31 08:26:28, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > 
> > Each CXL device may have multiple DOE mailbox capabilities and each
> > mailbox may support multiple protocols.  CXL port devices need to query
> > the CDAT information specifically.
> > 
> > Search the DOE mailboxes for one which supports the CDAT protocol.
> > Cache that mailbox to be used for future queries.
> > 
> > Only support memory devices at this time.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > Changes from V8
> > 	Incorporate feedback from Jonathan
> > 	Move all this to the cxl_port object
> > 
> > Changes from V7
> > 	Minor code clean ups
> > 
> > Changes from V6
> > 	Adjust for aux devices being a CXL only concept
> > 	Update commit msg.
> > 	Ensure devices iterated by auxiliary_find_device() are checked
> > 		to be DOE devices prior to checking for the CDAT
> > 		protocol
> > 	From Ben
> > 		Ensure reference from auxiliary_find_device() is dropped
> > ---
> >  drivers/cxl/core/pci.c  | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/cxl/core/port.c |  2 ++
> >  drivers/cxl/cxl.h       |  2 ++
> >  drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h    |  1 +
> >  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> > index c4c99ff7b55e..5497a65bdcf3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> > @@ -4,11 +4,14 @@
> >  #include <linux/device.h>
> >  #include <linux/delay.h>
> >  #include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci-doe.h>
> >  #include <cxlpci.h>
> >  #include <cxlmem.h>
> >  #include <cxl.h>
> >  #include "core.h"
> >  
> > +#define CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS 2
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * DOC: cxl core pci
> >   *
> > @@ -458,3 +461,28 @@ int cxl_hdm_decode_init(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_hdm_decode_init, CXL);
> > +
> > +void cxl_find_cdat_mb(struct cxl_port *port)
> 
> kdoc would be good for exported symbols IMO.

Yes.  This was not exported before and I forgot.

> Also if you can come up with a
> better verb than "find" for something that mutates the port's state, I think
> that would be beneficial.

cxl_cache_cdat_mb()?

Ira

> 
> I'm not sure why this is exported yet, but I suppose I'll see soon :-)
> 
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = port->uport;
> > +	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd;
> > +	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	if (!is_cxl_memdev(dev))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	cxlmd = to_cxl_memdev(dev);
> > +	cxlds = cxlmd->cxlds;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < cxlds->num_mbs; i++) {
> > +		struct pci_doe_mb *cur = cxlds->doe_mbs[i];
> > +
> > +		if (pci_doe_supports_prot(cur, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> > +					  CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS)) {
> > +			port->cdat_mb = cur;
> > +			return;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_find_cdat_mb, CXL);
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> > index ea60abda6500..2e2bd65c1024 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> > @@ -461,6 +461,8 @@ struct cxl_port *devm_cxl_add_port(struct device *host, struct device *uport,
> >  	if (IS_ERR(port))
> >  		return port;
> >  
> > +	cxl_find_cdat_mb(port);
> > +
> >  	dev = &port->dev;
> >  	if (is_cxl_memdev(uport))
> >  		rc = dev_set_name(dev, "endpoint%d", port->id);
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> > index 140dc3278cde..0a86be589ffc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> > @@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ struct cxl_nvdimm {
> >   * @component_reg_phys: component register capability base address (optional)
> >   * @dead: last ep has been removed, force port re-creation
> >   * @depth: How deep this port is relative to the root. depth 0 is the root.
> > + * @cdat_mb: Mailbox which supports the CDAT protocol
> >   */
> >  struct cxl_port {
> >  	struct device dev;
> > @@ -278,6 +279,7 @@ struct cxl_port {
> >  	resource_size_t component_reg_phys;
> >  	bool dead;
> >  	unsigned int depth;
> > +	struct pci_doe_mb *cdat_mb;
> >  };
> >  
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
> > index fce1c11729c2..366b21bd1a01 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
> > @@ -74,4 +74,5 @@ static inline resource_size_t cxl_regmap_to_base(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >  int devm_cxl_port_enumerate_dports(struct cxl_port *port);
> >  struct cxl_dev_state;
> >  int cxl_hdm_decode_init(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm);
> > +void cxl_find_cdat_mb(struct cxl_port *port);
> >  #endif /* __CXL_PCI_H__ */
> > -- 
> > 2.35.1
> > 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ