[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r148olol.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 10:03:06 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Durrant, Paul" <pdurrant@...zon.co.uk>
Cc: "Allister, Jack" <jalliste@...zon.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"diapop@...zon.co.uk" <diapop@...zon.co.uk>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"metikaya@...zon.co.uk" <metikaya@...zon.co.uk>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"sean.j.christopherson@...el.com" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"wanpengli@...cent.com" <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: ...\n
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 02:52:04PM +0000, Durrant, Paul wrote:
...
>>
>> I'll bite... What's ludicrous about wanting to run a guest at a lower
>> CPU freq to minimize observable change in whatever workload it is
>> running?
>
> *why* would you want to do that? Everybody wants their stuff done
> faster.
>
FWIW, I can see a valid use-case: imagine you're running some software
which calibrates itself in the beginning to run at some desired real
time speed but then the VM running it has to be migrated to a host with
faster (newer) CPUs. I don't have a real world examples out of top of my
head but I remember some old DOS era games were impossible to play on
newer CPUs because everything was happenning too fast. Maybe that's the
case :-)
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists