linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: vmx, pmu: accept 0 for absent MSRs when host-initiated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Jun 2022 10:54:11 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        likexu@...cent.com, Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: vmx, pmu: accept 0 for absent MSRs when
 host-initiated

On 5/31/22 20:37, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> +
>>   		/*
>>   		 * Writing depth MSR from guest could either setting the
>>   		 * MSR or resetting the LBR records with the side-effect.
>> @@ -535,6 +542,8 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>>   	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
>>   		if (!arch_lbr_ctl_is_valid(vcpu, data))
>>   			break;
>> +		if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>> +			return 0;
> 
> Similar bug here.
> 
> Can we just punt this out of kvm/queue until its been properly reviewed?

Yes, I agree.  I have started making some changes and pushed the result 
to kvm/arch-lbr-for-weijiang.

Most of the MSR handling is rewritten (and untested).

The nested VMX handling was also completely broken so I just removed it. 
  Instead, KVM should be adjusted so that it does not whine.

Paolo