linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests/vm: Add protection_keys tests to run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Jun 2022 14:44:04 +0530
From:   "Shetty, Kalpana" <kalpana.shetty@....com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     shuah@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/vm: Add protection_keys tests to run_vmtests


On 6/1/2022 12:10 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:56 +0530 Kalpana Shetty <kalpana.shetty@....com> wrote:
>
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh
>> @@ -179,4 +179,11 @@ run_test ./ksm_tests -N -m 1
>>   # KSM test with 2 NUMA nodes and merge_across_nodes = 0
>>   run_test ./ksm_tests -N -m 0
>>   
>> +# protection_keys tests
>> +if [ $VADDR64 -eq 0 ]; then
>> +	run_test ./protection_keys_32
>> +else
>> +	run_test ./protection_keys_64
>> +fi
>> +
>>   exit $exitcode
> So we're presently not running this test at all, unless invoked by
> hand?
Yes.
>
> I'm thinking we should backport this fix - have you any idea when we
> broke it?
We didn't break it, just adding "protection_keys" test as part of 
run_vmtests.sh

Thanks,

Kalpana