linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add support for MT8365 EVK board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <efdbb151-8213-d1e7-a935-0e857947d450@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 1 Jun 2022 11:32:06 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
        qii.wang@...iatek.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com, jic23@...nel.org,
        chaotian.jing@...iatek.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com,
        broonie@...nel.org, wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux@...ck-us.net
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add support for MT8365 EVK board

On 31/05/2022 15:50, Fabien Parent wrote:
> This patch series adds support for the MT8365 EVK board.
> 
> This series has dependencies on the following series:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=646256
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=646091
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=646083
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=646081
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=646076
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=646068
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=646020
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=646052
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220504091923.2219-2-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220512062622.31484-2-chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220512062622.31484-1-chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220524115019.97246-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220127015857.9868-1-biao.huang@mediatek.com/

Eh... and how we are supposed to test or apply this? Such dependencies
could mean none of automated tools will pick it up, so your patchset has
to wait till dependencies got merged.


Best regards,
Krzysztof