linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: vmx, pmu: accept 0 for absent MSRs when host-initiated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d763aede-8ca3-58b0-ef58-fb169cfc53c0@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Jun 2022 18:42:45 +0800
From:   "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "likexu@...cent.com" <likexu@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: vmx, pmu: accept 0 for absent MSRs when
 host-initiated


On 6/1/2022 6:15 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 6/1/22 11:12, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
>>> Yes, I agree.  I have started making some changes and pushed the
>>> result to kvm/arch-lbr-for-weijiang.
>>>
>>> Most of the MSR handling is rewritten (and untested).
>>>
>>> The nested VMX handling was also completely broken so I just removed
>>> it.  Instead, KVM should be adjusted so that it does not whine.
>> Noted, I'll run tests based on it, thanks a lot!
>>
>> Has the branch been pushed? I cannot see it.
> It's just lbr-for-weijiang, sorry for mistyping.
Found it, thank you!
>
> Paolo
>