linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 1/2] clk: hisilicon: add CRG driver Hi3521a SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a2a98c6d-2ff7-89f6-0711-c8f8b99e85c2@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 1 Jun 2022 13:09:28 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     "Marty E. Plummer" <hanetzer@...rtmail.com>
Cc:     arnd@...db.de, cai.huoqing@...ux.dev, christian.koenig@....com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, gengdongjiu@...wei.com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, michael@...le.cc, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
        mturquette@...libre.com, novikov@...ras.ru, olof@...om.net,
        p.yadav@...com, rdunlap@...radead.org, richard@....at,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, sboyd@...nel.org, soc@...nel.org,
        sumit.semwal@...aro.org, tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com,
        vigneshr@...com, xuwei5@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/2] clk: hisilicon: add CRG driver Hi3521a SoC

On 01/06/2022 13:06, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 01:00:38PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 01/06/2022 12:58, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 01:37:42PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 01/05/2022 19:34, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
>>>>> Add CRG driver for Hi3521A SoC. CRG (Clock and Reset Generator) module
>>>>> generates clock and reset signals used by other module blocks on SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marty E. Plummer <hanetzer@...rtmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/clk/hisilicon/Kconfig             |   8 ++
>>>>>  drivers/clk/hisilicon/Makefile            |   1 +
>>>>>  drivers/clk/hisilicon/crg-hi3521a.c       | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  include/dt-bindings/clock/hi3521a-clock.h |  34 ++++++
>>>>
>>>> Bindings go to separate patch. Your patchset is unmerge'able.
>>>>
>>> So, assuming I have the following patches:
>>> 1: +include/dt-bindings/clock/hi3521a-clock.h
>>> 2: +drivers/clk/hisilicon/crg-hi3521a.c
>>> 3: +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/whatever
>>>
>>> In what order should they be applied?
>>
>> Applied or sent? The maintainer will apply them in proper order, this is
>> bisectable.
>>
>>
> Either or. Whatever makes the workload easier is what I'm looking for.

Sorry, you need to be more specific. Apply is not a job for you, for the
patch submitter.

Then you miss here important piece - which is the first patch. DTS goes
always via separate branch (or even tree) from driver changes. That's
why bindings are always separate first patches.

Best regards,
Krzysztof