[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff029402-f90c-096a-7366-b58f53555ace@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 16:54:48 +0530
From: Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi <quic_vnivarth@...cinc.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>, <dianders@...omium.org>,
<mka@...omium.org>, <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [V4] serial: core: Do stop_rx in suspend path for console if
console_suspend is disabled
Hi,
On 5/24/2022 5:24 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 23.05.2022 23:32, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 16.05.2022 11:20, Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi wrote:
>>> For the case of console_suspend disabled, if back to back suspend/resume
>>> test is executed, at the end of test, sometimes console would appear to
>>> be frozen not responding to input. This would happen because, during
>>> resume, rx transactions can come in before system is ready, malfunction
>>> of rx happens in turn resulting in console appearing to be stuck.
>>>
>>> Do a stop_rx in suspend sequence to prevent this.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi <quic_vnivarth@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> v4: moved the change to serial core to apply for all drivers
>>> v3: swapped the order of conditions to be more human readable
>>> v2: restricted patch to contain only stop_rx in suspend sequence
>>> v1: intial patch contained 2 additional unrelated changes in vicinity
>>> ---
>> This patch landed recently in linux-next as commit c9d2325cdb92
>> ("serial: core: Do stop_rx in suspend path for console if
>> console_suspend is disabled").
>>
>> Unfortunately it breaks console operation on my test systems after
>> system suspend/resume cycle if 'no_console_suspend' kernel parameter
>> is present. System properly resumes from suspend, the console displays
>> all the messages and even command line prompt, but then doesn't react
>> on any input. If I remove the 'no_console_suspend' parameter, the
>> console is again operational after system suspend/resume cycle. Before
>> this patch it worked fine regardless the 'no_console_suspend' parameter.
>>
>> If this matters, the test system is ARM 32bit Samsung Exynos5422-based
>> Odroid XU3lite board.
>
> One more information. This issue can be easily reproduced with QEMU. It
> happens both on ARM 32bit and ARM 64bit QEMU's 'virt' machines when
> 'no_console_suspend' is added to kernel's cmdline.
>
Ideally, as comments indicate, the set_termios should have done stop_rx
at begin and start_rx at end to take care of this issue.
This is probably missing in your driver. Can we check if this can be
fixed? OR other option is
Add a start_rx in uart_resume_port after call to set_termios to handle
this scenario for other drivers.
Please let me know if there are any concerns for this options.
>>> drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 11 +++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>>> b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>>> index 82a1770..9a85b41 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>>> @@ -2211,9 +2211,16 @@ int uart_suspend_port(struct uart_driver *drv,
>>> struct uart_port *uport)
>>> }
>>> put_device(tty_dev);
>>> - /* Nothing to do if the console is not suspending */
>>> - if (!console_suspend_enabled && uart_console(uport))
>>> + /*
>>> + * Nothing to do if the console is not suspending
>>> + * except stop_rx to prevent any asynchronous data
>>> + * over RX line. Re-start_rx, when required, is
>>> + * done by set_termios in resume sequence
>>> + */
>>> + if (!console_suspend_enabled && uart_console(uport)) {
>>> + uport->ops->stop_rx(uport);
>>> goto unlock;
>>> + }
>>> uport->suspended = 1;
>> Best regards
> Best regards
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists