linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: cleanup CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YpdT756zYIaMzsN3@FVFYT0MHHV2J.googleapis.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Jun 2022 19:56:31 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     mike.kravetz@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        smuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: cleanup
 CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP*

On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 12:10:29PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.06.22 11:54, Muchun Song wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 11:32:37AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 04.04.22 09:46, Muchun Song wrote:
> >>> The word of "free" is not expressive enough to express the feature of optimizing
> >>> vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB, rename this keywork to "optimeze".
> >>> In this patch , cheanup configs to make code more expressive.
> >>
> >> Nit: why not simply CONFIG_HUGETLB_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP if we're touching
> >> this already? At least I don't see value in the additional "PAGE" :)
> >>
> > 
> > I thought it keep consistent with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE.  If you think
> > CONFIG_HUGETLB_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP is a better name, maybe we need to
> > another separate patch since this series is already on mm-stable branch.
> 
> I see, makes sense then.
> 
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  4 ++--
> >>>  Documentation/admin-guide/mm/hugetlbpage.rst    |  2 +-
> >>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                              |  2 +-
> >>>  arch/arm64/mm/flush.c                           |  2 +-
> >>>  arch/x86/Kconfig                                |  2 +-
> >>>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c                           |  2 +-
> >>>  fs/Kconfig                                      | 16 ++++++++--------
> >>>  include/linux/hugetlb.h                         |  2 +-
> >>>  include/linux/mm.h                              |  2 +-
> >>>  include/linux/page-flags.h                      |  6 +++---
> >>>  mm/Makefile                                     |  2 +-
> >>>  mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c                            |  4 ++--
> >>>  mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h                            |  4 ++--
> >>>  mm/sparse-vmemmap.c                             |  4 ++--
> >>>  14 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >>> index 56edbe3f458f..89a58ac49d5f 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >>> @@ -1660,7 +1660,7 @@
> >>>  			Format: size[KMG]
> >>>  
> >>>  	hugetlb_free_vmemmap=
> >>
> >> We didn't change the parameter name in #2, correct?
> >>
> > 
> > I think this is a interface to users. Is it correct to
> > change it?
> 
> I guess so ... I was just wanted to confirm that this is still correct :)
>

Well, I think it is not correct to change it since it
could change behavior to users. :-)

Thanks.