linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 01/20] IB/rdmavt: add missing locks in rvt_ruc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220601135902.2004823-1-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed,  1 Jun 2022 09:58:43 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@...il.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 01/20] IB/rdmavt: add missing locks in rvt_ruc_loopback

From: Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 22cbc6c2681a0a4fe76150270426e763d52353a4 ]

The documentation of the function rvt_error_qp says both r_lock and
s_lock need to be held when calling that function.
It also asserts using lockdep that both of those locks are held.
rvt_error_qp is called form rvt_send_cq, which is called from
rvt_qp_complete_swqe, which is called from rvt_send_complete, which is
called from rvt_ruc_loopback in two places. Both of these places do not
hold r_lock. Fix this by acquiring a spin_lock of r_lock in both of
these places.
The r_lock acquiring cannot be added in rvt_qp_complete_swqe because
some of its other callers already have r_lock acquired.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220228195144.71946-1-dossche.niels@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c
index 48e8612c1bc8..e97c13967174 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c
@@ -2812,7 +2812,7 @@ void rvt_qp_iter(struct rvt_dev_info *rdi,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rvt_qp_iter);
 
 /*
- * This should be called with s_lock held.
+ * This should be called with s_lock and r_lock held.
  */
 void rvt_send_complete(struct rvt_qp *qp, struct rvt_swqe *wqe,
 		       enum ib_wc_status status)
@@ -3171,7 +3171,9 @@ void rvt_ruc_loopback(struct rvt_qp *sqp)
 	rvp->n_loop_pkts++;
 flush_send:
 	sqp->s_rnr_retry = sqp->s_rnr_retry_cnt;
+	spin_lock(&sqp->r_lock);
 	rvt_send_complete(sqp, wqe, send_status);
+	spin_unlock(&sqp->r_lock);
 	if (local_ops) {
 		atomic_dec(&sqp->local_ops_pending);
 		local_ops = 0;
@@ -3225,7 +3227,9 @@ void rvt_ruc_loopback(struct rvt_qp *sqp)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&qp->r_lock, flags);
 serr_no_r_lock:
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sqp->s_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock(&sqp->r_lock);
 	rvt_send_complete(sqp, wqe, send_status);
+	spin_unlock(&sqp->r_lock);
 	if (sqp->ibqp.qp_type == IB_QPT_RC) {
 		int lastwqe;
 
-- 
2.35.1