[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220602224754.602074-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 15:47:54 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH] perf/core: Call LSM hook after copying perf_event_attr
It passes the attr struct to the security_perf_event_open() but it's
not initialized yet.
Fixes: da97e18458fb ("perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks")
Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 7858bafffa9d..e035545f624f 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -12033,12 +12033,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
if (flags & ~PERF_FLAG_ALL)
return -EINVAL;
- /* Do we allow access to perf_event_open(2) ? */
- err = security_perf_event_open(&attr, PERF_SECURITY_OPEN);
+ err = perf_copy_attr(attr_uptr, &attr);
if (err)
return err;
- err = perf_copy_attr(attr_uptr, &attr);
+ /* Do we allow access to perf_event_open(2) ? */
+ err = security_perf_event_open(&attr, PERF_SECURITY_OPEN);
if (err)
return err;
--
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists