linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 09/12] iommu/vt-d: Check device list of domain in domain free path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB527652AF527A66551934CD4F8CDE9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Jun 2022 06:29:42 +0000
From:   "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To:     Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@...dia.com>
CC:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 09/12] iommu/vt-d: Check device list of domain in domain
 free path

> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 7:02 PM
> 
> On 2022/6/1 17:28, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> >> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2022 2:30 PM
> >>
> >> When the IOMMU domain is about to be freed, it should not be set on
> any
> >> device. Instead of silently dealing with some bug cases, it's better to
> >> trigger a warning to report and fix any potential bugs at the first time.
> >>
> >
> >
> >>   static void domain_exit(struct dmar_domain *domain)
> >>   {
> >> -
> >> -	/* Remove associated devices and clear attached or cached domains
> >> */
> >> -	domain_remove_dev_info(domain);
> >> +	if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&domain->devices)))
> >> +		return;
> >>
> >
> > warning is good but it doesn't mean the driver shouldn't deal with
> > that situation to make it safer e.g. blocking DMA from all attached
> > device...
> 
> I have ever thought the same thing. :-)
> 
> Blocking DMA from attached device should be done when setting blocking
> domain to the device. It should not be part of freeing a domain.

yes but here we are talking about some bug scenario.

> 
> Here, the caller asks the driver to free the domain, but the driver
> finds that something is wrong. Therefore, it warns and returns directly.
> The domain will still be there in use until the next set_domain().
> 

at least it'd look safer if we always try to unmap the entire domain i.e.:

static void domain_exit(struct dmar_domain *domain)
{
-
-	/* Remove associated devices and clear attached or cached domains */
-	domain_remove_dev_info(domain);

	if (domain->pgd) {
		LIST_HEAD(freelist);

		domain_unmap(domain, 0, DOMAIN_MAX_PFN(domain->gaw), &freelist);
		put_pages_list(&freelist);
	}

+	if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&domain->devices)))
+		return;

	kfree(domain);
}

Thanks
Kevin