[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n50nfwZPdSS7Vw9FiV+Shfn9-bX44hfLq5ey9DBsAy0y4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 18:13:40 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>,
agross@...nel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
bgoswami@...cinc.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
broonie@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
judyhsiao@...omium.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, perex@...ex.cz,
quic_plai@...cinc.com, quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, tiwai@...e.com
Cc: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: sc7280: Add compatible
string for adsp based platforms
Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2022-06-01 03:30:14)
> Add compatible string to support adsp enabled sc7280 platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@...cinc.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml
> index d32ee32..53c2c59 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ description: |
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - const: qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl
> + enum:
> + - qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl
> + - qcom,sc7280-lpass-adsp-lpi-pinctrl
Can you confirm that this is the same hardware (i.e. same reg property)
but just a different compatible string used to convey that the device is
using "adsp" mode or not? If so, this looks to be a common pattern for
the audio hardware here, where we have two "views" of the hardware, one
for adsp mode and one for not adsp mode. I guess the not adsp mode is
called "adsp bypass"?
Is that right? Why are we conveying this information via the compatible
string?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists