[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7d62376-49b7-8929-7027-9c81703a5f7b@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:09:54 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: ti: pruss: Update bindings for K3
AM62x SoCs
On 02/06/2022 12:03, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 16/05/22 20:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/05/2022 14:33, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> On 28/04/22 11:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 27/04/2022 09:27, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>> Update the PRUSS bindings for the PRUSSM instance present in
>>>>> AM625 SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml | 1 +
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
>>>>> index 64461d432004..cf13e5179657 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
>>>>> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ properties:
>>>>> - ti,am654-icssg # for K3 AM65x SoC family
>>>>> - ti,j721e-icssg # for K3 J721E SoC family
>>>>> - ti,am642-icssg # for K3 AM64x SoC family
>>>>> + - ti,am625-pruss # for K3 AM62x SoC family
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Looks like out of order (although for some reason before it was also
>>>> misordered...).
>>>
>>> These are really in the chronological order of the introduction of SoCs.
>>> Isn't that okay to have?
>>
>> You mean order of release on the market of order of adding files here?
>> The first is ok, the latter would mean there is no order at all.
>
> I meant order of release to market. Anyways, I'll send a patch to change
> the order to alphabetic order.
It's okay to keep it then in such release-market order. Up to you:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists