linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 01/15] dt-binding: remoteproc: mediatek: Support dual-core SCP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e084e508-d886-3e6c-53ab-1f0b22706964@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 2 Jun 2022 14:02:39 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@...iatek.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@...omium.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
        "Dustin L. Howett" <dustin@...ett.net>,
        Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
        weishunc@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/15] dt-binding: remoteproc: mediatek: Support
 dual-core SCP

On 02/06/2022 13:29, Tinghan Shen wrote:
>> Maybe the hardware property is that one core has its sibling and you
>> provide here that sibling?
> 
> Yes, exactly. I'm sorry for misreading your argument.
> 
> How about this one,
>    
>   Reference to the sibling SCP core. This is required when 
>   dual-core SCP support is enabled.

Yes, sounds good. Thank you.


Best regards,
Krzysztof