[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ypje1evt/iNB2+MH@google.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 16:01:25 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Robert Dinse <nanook@...imo.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] KVM: x86: Bug the VM if the emulator accesses a
non-existent GPR
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > static const struct x86_emulate_ops emulate_ops = {
> > + .vm_bugged = emulator_vm_bugged,
> > .read_gpr = emulator_read_gpr,
> > .write_gpr = emulator_write_gpr,
> > .read_std = emulator_read_std,
>
> Is it actually "vm_bugged" or "kvm_bugged"? :-)
vm_bugged. KVM_BUG_ON() because it's a KVM bug on the condition, but the invididual
VM is what's bugged/dead, i.e. other VMs and thus KVM itself get to live on. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists