[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YpjpeMsFsVUxuh3W@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 17:46:48 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>,
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page()
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 09:22:15AM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 03:25:45PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 04:53:32PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > > This is the first series of patches aimed towards the conversion of Btrfs
> > > filesystem from the use of kmap() to kmap_local_page().
> >
> > We've already had patches converting kmaps and you're changing the last
> > ones, so this is could be the last series, with two exceptions.
> >
> > 1) You've changed lzo.c and zlib. but the same kmap/kunmap pattern is
> > used in zstd.c.
>
> I checked out zstd.c and one of the issues there is the way that the input
> workspace is mapped page by page while iterating those pages.
>
> This got me thinking about what Willy said at LSFmm concerning something like
> kmap_local_range(). Mapping more than 1 page at a time could save some
> unmap/remap of output pages required for kmap_local_page() ordering.
Umm ... Not entirely sure what I said, but it'd be really hard to kmap
multiple pages with the current PAE implementation. I've steered away
from doing that for now, and kmap_local_folio() just guarantees the
page that the offset lands in is mapped.
I don't think the right answer is having a kmap_folio() that will map
the entire folio. I'd be more tempted to add vmap_folio() for that.
My understanding is that PAE systems have more address space available
for vmap than they do for kmap.
> Unfortunately, I think the length of the input is probably to long in many
> cases. And some remapping may still be required.
>
> Cc: Willy
>
> As an aside, Willy, I'm thinking that a kmap_local_range() should return a
> folio in some way. Would you agree?
I imagine it taking a folio to describe the range that's being accessed.
But maybe it should be a phys_addr_t? I tend to prefer phys_addr_t over
pfn + offset as it's more compact on 64-bit systems and the same on
32-bit systems.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists