[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YpjsTNZx4DG+kot4@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 06:58:52 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] blk-cgroup: Optimize blkcg_rstat_flush()
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 09:35:43AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> @@ -2011,9 +2076,16 @@ void blk_cgroup_bio_start(struct bio *bio)
> }
> bis->cur.ios[rwd]++;
>
> + if (!READ_ONCE(bis->lnode.next)) {
> + struct llist_head *lhead = per_cpu_ptr(blkcg->lhead, cpu);
> +
> + llist_add(&bis->lnode, lhead);
> + percpu_ref_get(&bis->blkg->refcnt);
Hmm... what guarantees that more than one threads race here? llist assumes
that there's a single writer for a given llist_node and the ref count would
be off too, right?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists