[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220602112248.1e3cd871a87fe9df1ca13f08@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 11:22:48 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Cc: <willy@...radead.org>, <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
<axboe@...nel.dk>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm/filemap: fix that first page is not mark
accessed in filemap_read()
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 16:21:29 +0800 Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com> wrote:
> In filemap_read(), 'ra->prev_pos' is set to 'iocb->ki_pos + copied',
> while it should be 'iocb->ki_ops'. For consequence,
> folio_mark_accessed() will not be called for 'fbatch.folios[0]' since
> 'iocb->ki_pos' is always equal to 'ra->prev_pos'.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -2728,10 +2728,11 @@ ssize_t filemap_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> flush_dcache_folio(folio);
>
> copied = copy_folio_to_iter(folio, offset, bytes, iter);
> -
> - already_read += copied;
> - iocb->ki_pos += copied;
> - ra->prev_pos = iocb->ki_pos;
> + if (copied) {
> + ra->prev_pos = iocb->ki_pos;
> + already_read += copied;
> + iocb->ki_pos += copied;
> + }
>
> if (copied < bytes) {
> error = -EFAULT;
It seems tidier, but does it matter? If copied==0 we're going to break
out and return -EFAULT anyway?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists