[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220602191757.pqictbfarmvlf72f@mraw.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 21:17:57 +0200
From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, james.dutton@...il.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI: brcmstb: Fix regression regarding missing
PCIe linkup
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com> (2022-05-30):
> i think we should better trust the results based on the v5.18 tag. During
> the merge window, regressions from other subsystems are possible.
Alright, that looks like a great plan.
Before getting your answer, I had tried taking the reboot part out of
the equation, but I found out that even cold boots might fail with the
mmc storage.
I haven't been able to conduct a systematic testing of the patch on top
of the v5.18 tag yet (say, 10 or 20 cold boots, and the same with
reboots) due to strong work constraints these past few days, but that's
definitely still on my short term todo list (hopefully before the end of
the week).
Sorry I didn't manage to get that lined up before Bjorn's pull request.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@...ian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists