[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YpkP6kExQcQZd2/O@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 12:30:50 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Richard Fontana <fontana@...rpeleven.org>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"jeyu@...nel.org" <jeyu@...nel.org>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"minchan@...nel.org" <minchan@...nel.org>,
"linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.com>,
Kuno Woudt <kuno@...b.nl>,
"copyleft-next@...ts.fedorahosted.org"
<copyleft-next@...ts.fedorahosted.org>,
Ciaran Farrell <Ciaran.Farrell@...e.com>,
Christopher De Nicolo <Christopher.DeNicolo@...e.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 04:11:16AM +0000, Bird, Tim wrote:
> I don't think that the Linux kernel should be used for license promotion, but if it is,
> then it should be used to promote GPL-v2-only.
I already *used* copyleft-next on Linux on a dual licensed manner, the
patches in question are about using SPDX to simpllify things and adaopt
the SPDX annotations.
And, to re-iterate once more, I'm using copyeft-next as that is *my*
license of choice for *any* new software projects I use and I want to enable
cross prolination between them. I have been doing this since I wrote
CRDA many years ago. I have many reasons for using copyleft-next and I've
listed many of the reasons why a free software developer would care to enable
this cross polination but yet again you seem to be disregarding all that.
This is similar to how 2-cluase BSD is compatible with the GPL
and is used for cross polination to BSDs even though in practice
a lot of that cross polination may not happen.
There are practical uses here and I've been using this license for years now
and I have no intention on stopping.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists