| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220603173822.153897173@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 19:42:58 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 14/75] assoc_array: Fix BUG_ON during garbage collect
From: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com>
commit d1dc87763f406d4e67caf16dbe438a5647692395 upstream.
A rare BUG_ON triggered in assoc_array_gc:
[3430308.818153] kernel BUG at lib/assoc_array.c:1609!
Which corresponded to the statement currently at line 1593 upstream:
BUG_ON(assoc_array_ptr_is_meta(p));
Using the data from the core dump, I was able to generate a userspace
reproducer[1] and determine the cause of the bug.
[1]: https://github.com/brenns10/kernel_stuff/tree/master/assoc_array_gc
After running the iterator on the entire branch, an internal tree node
looked like the following:
NODE (nr_leaves_on_branch: 3)
SLOT [0] NODE (2 leaves)
SLOT [1] NODE (1 leaf)
SLOT [2..f] NODE (empty)
In the userspace reproducer, the pr_devel output when compressing this
node was:
-- compress node 0x5607cc089380 --
free=0, leaves=0
[0] retain node 2/1 [nx 0]
[1] fold node 1/1 [nx 0]
[2] fold node 0/1 [nx 2]
[3] fold node 0/2 [nx 2]
[4] fold node 0/3 [nx 2]
[5] fold node 0/4 [nx 2]
[6] fold node 0/5 [nx 2]
[7] fold node 0/6 [nx 2]
[8] fold node 0/7 [nx 2]
[9] fold node 0/8 [nx 2]
[10] fold node 0/9 [nx 2]
[11] fold node 0/10 [nx 2]
[12] fold node 0/11 [nx 2]
[13] fold node 0/12 [nx 2]
[14] fold node 0/13 [nx 2]
[15] fold node 0/14 [nx 2]
after: 3
At slot 0, an internal node with 2 leaves could not be folded into the
node, because there was only one available slot (slot 0). Thus, the
internal node was retained. At slot 1, the node had one leaf, and was
able to be folded in successfully. The remaining nodes had no leaves,
and so were removed. By the end of the compression stage, there were 14
free slots, and only 3 leaf nodes. The tree was ascended and then its
parent node was compressed. When this node was seen, it could not be
folded, due to the internal node it contained.
The invariant for compression in this function is: whenever
nr_leaves_on_branch < ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_OUT, the node should contain all
leaf nodes. The compression step currently cannot guarantee this, given
the corner case shown above.
To fix this issue, retry compression whenever we have retained a node,
and yet nr_leaves_on_branch < ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_OUT. This second
compression will then allow the node in slot 1 to be folded in,
satisfying the invariant. Below is the output of the reproducer once the
fix is applied:
-- compress node 0x560e9c562380 --
free=0, leaves=0
[0] retain node 2/1 [nx 0]
[1] fold node 1/1 [nx 0]
[2] fold node 0/1 [nx 2]
[3] fold node 0/2 [nx 2]
[4] fold node 0/3 [nx 2]
[5] fold node 0/4 [nx 2]
[6] fold node 0/5 [nx 2]
[7] fold node 0/6 [nx 2]
[8] fold node 0/7 [nx 2]
[9] fold node 0/8 [nx 2]
[10] fold node 0/9 [nx 2]
[11] fold node 0/10 [nx 2]
[12] fold node 0/11 [nx 2]
[13] fold node 0/12 [nx 2]
[14] fold node 0/13 [nx 2]
[15] fold node 0/14 [nx 2]
internal nodes remain despite enough space, retrying
-- compress node 0x560e9c562380 --
free=14, leaves=1
[0] fold node 2/15 [nx 0]
after: 3
Changes
=======
DH:
- Use false instead of 0.
- Reorder the inserted lines in a couple of places to put retained before
next_slot.
ver #2)
- Fix typo in pr_devel, correct comparison to "<="
Fixes: 3cb989501c26 ("Add a generic associative array implementation.")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511225517.407935-1-stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com/ # v1
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220512215045.489140-1-stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com/ # v2
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
lib/assoc_array.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
--- a/lib/assoc_array.c
+++ b/lib/assoc_array.c
@@ -1461,6 +1461,7 @@ int assoc_array_gc(struct assoc_array *a
struct assoc_array_ptr *cursor, *ptr;
struct assoc_array_ptr *new_root, *new_parent, **new_ptr_pp;
unsigned long nr_leaves_on_tree;
+ bool retained;
int keylen, slot, nr_free, next_slot, i;
pr_devel("-->%s()\n", __func__);
@@ -1536,6 +1537,7 @@ continue_node:
goto descend;
}
+retry_compress:
pr_devel("-- compress node %p --\n", new_n);
/* Count up the number of empty slots in this node and work out the
@@ -1553,6 +1555,7 @@ continue_node:
pr_devel("free=%d, leaves=%lu\n", nr_free, new_n->nr_leaves_on_branch);
/* See what we can fold in */
+ retained = false;
next_slot = 0;
for (slot = 0; slot < ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_OUT; slot++) {
struct assoc_array_shortcut *s;
@@ -1602,9 +1605,14 @@ continue_node:
pr_devel("[%d] retain node %lu/%d [nx %d]\n",
slot, child->nr_leaves_on_branch, nr_free + 1,
next_slot);
+ retained = true;
}
}
+ if (retained && new_n->nr_leaves_on_branch <= ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_OUT) {
+ pr_devel("internal nodes remain despite enough space, retrying\n");
+ goto retry_compress;
+ }
pr_devel("after: %lu\n", new_n->nr_leaves_on_branch);
nr_leaves_on_tree = new_n->nr_leaves_on_branch;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists