[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220603173822.770199379@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 19:43:20 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 36/75] KVM: x86: Fix the intel_pt PMI handling wrongly considered from guest
From: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...el.com>
commit ffd1925a596ce68bed7d81c61cb64bc35f788a9d upstream.
When kernel handles the vm-exit caused by external interrupts and NMI,
it always sets kvm_intr_type to tell if it's dealing an IRQ or NMI. For
the PMI scenario, it could be IRQ or NMI.
However, intel_pt PMIs are only generated for HARDWARE perf events, and
HARDWARE events are always configured to generate NMIs. Use
kvm_handling_nmi_from_guest() to precisely identify if the intel_pt PMI
came from the guest; this avoids false positives if an intel_pt PMI/NMI
arrives while the host is handling an unrelated IRQ VM-Exit.
Fixes: db215756ae59 ("KVM: x86: More precisely identify NMI from guest when handling PMI")
Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...el.com>
Message-Id: <20220523140821.1345605-1-yanfei.xu@...el.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -7858,7 +7858,7 @@ static unsigned int vmx_handle_intel_pt_
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_get_running_vcpu();
/* '0' on failure so that the !PT case can use a RET0 static call. */
- if (!kvm_arch_pmi_in_guest(vcpu))
+ if (!vcpu || !kvm_handling_nmi_from_guest(vcpu))
return 0;
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_PMI, vcpu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists