linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 053/144] KVM: selftests: Convert vmx_preemption_timer_test away from VCPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220603004331.1523888-54-seanjc@google.com>
Date:   Fri,  3 Jun 2022 00:42:00 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
        Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 053/144] KVM: selftests: Convert vmx_preemption_timer_test
 away from VCPU_ID

Convert vmx_preemption_timer_test to use vm_create_with_one_vcpu() and
pass around a 'struct kvm_vcpu' object instead of using a global VCPU_ID.
Note, this is a "functional" change in the sense that the test now
creates a vCPU with vcpu_id==0 instead of vcpu_id==5.  The non-zero
VCPU_ID was 100% arbitrary and added little to no validation coverage.
If testing non-zero vCPU IDs is desirable for generic tests, that can be
done in the future by tweaking the VM creation helpers.

Opportunistically use vcpu_run() instead of _vcpu_run(), the test expects
KVM_RUN to succeed.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 .../kvm/x86_64/vmx_preemption_timer_test.c    | 30 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_preemption_timer_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_preemption_timer_test.c
index f5b4ae914131..168adc5b2272 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_preemption_timer_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_preemption_timer_test.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
 #include "processor.h"
 #include "vmx.h"
 
-#define VCPU_ID		5
 #define PREEMPTION_TIMER_VALUE			100000000ull
 #define PREEMPTION_TIMER_VALUE_THRESHOLD1	 80000000ull
 
@@ -159,6 +158,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	struct kvm_regs regs1, regs2;
 	struct kvm_vm *vm;
 	struct kvm_run *run;
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	struct kvm_x86_state *state;
 	struct ucall uc;
 	int stage;
@@ -175,22 +175,22 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	}
 
 	/* Create VM */
-	vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code);
-	run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+	vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code);
+	run = vcpu->run;
 
-	vcpu_regs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, &regs1);
+	vcpu_regs_get(vm, vcpu->id, &regs1);
 
 	vcpu_alloc_vmx(vm, &vmx_pages_gva);
-	vcpu_args_set(vm, VCPU_ID, 1, vmx_pages_gva);
+	vcpu_args_set(vm, vcpu->id, 1, vmx_pages_gva);
 
 	for (stage = 1;; stage++) {
-		_vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
+		vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id);
 		TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO,
 			    "Stage %d: unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n",
 			    stage, run->exit_reason,
 			    exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
 
-		switch (get_ucall(vm, VCPU_ID, &uc)) {
+		switch (get_ucall(vm, vcpu->id, &uc)) {
 		case UCALL_ABORT:
 			TEST_FAIL("%s at %s:%ld", (const char *)uc.args[0],
 				  __FILE__, uc.args[1]);
@@ -232,22 +232,22 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 				stage, uc.args[4], uc.args[5]);
 		}
 
-		state = vcpu_save_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+		state = vcpu_save_state(vm, vcpu->id);
 		memset(&regs1, 0, sizeof(regs1));
-		vcpu_regs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, &regs1);
+		vcpu_regs_get(vm, vcpu->id, &regs1);
 
 		kvm_vm_release(vm);
 
 		/* Restore state in a new VM.  */
-		kvm_vm_restart(vm);
-		vm_vcpu_add(vm, VCPU_ID);
-		vcpu_set_cpuid(vm, VCPU_ID, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
-		vcpu_load_state(vm, VCPU_ID, state);
-		run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+		vcpu = vm_recreate_with_one_vcpu(vm);
+
+		vcpu_set_cpuid(vm, vcpu->id, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
+		vcpu_load_state(vm, vcpu->id, state);
+		run = vcpu->run;
 		kvm_x86_state_cleanup(state);
 
 		memset(&regs2, 0, sizeof(regs2));
-		vcpu_regs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, &regs2);
+		vcpu_regs_get(vm, vcpu->id, &regs2);
 		TEST_ASSERT(!memcmp(&regs1, &regs2, sizeof(regs2)),
 			    "Unexpected register values after vcpu_load_state; rdi: %lx rsi: %lx",
 			    (ulong) regs2.rdi, (ulong) regs2.rsi);
-- 
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog