[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220603125516.52353a4a@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 12:55:16 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Chen Lin <chen45464546@....com>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
john@...ozen.org, sean.wang@...iatek.com, Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: fix misuse of mem alloc
interface netdev[napi]_alloc_frag
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 12:11:43 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Yes, we only have to review callers and change the documentation and
> implementation.
>
> The confusion/overhead/generalization came with :
>
> commit 7ba7aeabbaba484347cc98fbe9045769ca0d118d
> Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> Date: Fri Jun 7 21:20:34 2019 +0200
>
> net: Don't disable interrupts in napi_alloc_frag()
>
> netdev_alloc_frag() can be used from any context and is used by NAPI
> and non-NAPI drivers. Non-NAPI drivers use it in interrupt context
> and NAPI drivers use it during initial allocation (->ndo_open() or
> ->ndo_change_mtu()). Some NAPI drivers share the same function for the
> initial allocation and the allocation in their NAPI callback.
>
> The interrupts are disabled in order to ensure locked access from every
> context to `netdev_alloc_cache'.
>
> Let netdev_alloc_frag() check if interrupts are disabled. If they are,
> use `netdev_alloc_cache' otherwise disable BH and invoke
> __napi_alloc_frag() for the allocation. The IRQ check is cheaper
> compared to disabling & enabling interrupts and memory allocation with
> disabled interrupts does not work on -RT.
Hm, should have looked at the code. Were you thinking of adding a
helper which would replace both netdev_ and napi_ variants and DTRT
internally?
An option for getting GFP_KERNEL in there would be having an rtnl frag
cache. Users who need frags on the reconfig path should be under rtnl,
they can call rtnl_alloc_frag(), which can use GFP_KERNEL internally.
Otherwise the GFP_KERNEL frag cache would need to be protected by
another mutex, I presume. Pre-allocating memory before using the napi
cache seems hard.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists