[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220603004331.1523888-85-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 00:42:31 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 084/144] KVM: selftests: Convert cr4_cpuid_sync_test away
from VCPU_ID
Convert cr4_cpuid_sync_test to use vm_create_with_one_vcpu() and pass
around a 'struct kvm_vcpu' object instead of using a global VCPU_ID. Note,
this is a "functional" change in the sense that the test now creates a vCPU
with vcpu_id==0 instead of vcpu_id==1. The non-zero VCPU_ID was 100%
arbitrary and added little to no validation coverage. If testing non-zero
vCPU IDs is desirable for generic tests, that can be done in the future by
tweaking the VM creation helpers.
Opportunistically use vcpu_run() instead of _vcpu_run() with an open
coded assert that KVM_RUN succeeded.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test.c | 17 +++++++----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test.c
index 6f6fd189dda3..d5615cd0b81b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
#define X86_FEATURE_XSAVE (1<<26)
#define X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE (1<<27)
-#define VCPU_ID 1
static inline bool cr4_cpuid_is_sync(void)
{
@@ -63,12 +62,12 @@ static void guest_code(void)
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_run *run;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct kvm_sregs sregs;
struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
struct ucall uc;
- int rc;
entry = kvm_get_supported_cpuid_entry(1);
if (!(entry->ecx & X86_FEATURE_XSAVE)) {
@@ -79,25 +78,23 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
/* Tell stdout not to buffer its content */
setbuf(stdout, NULL);
- /* Create VM */
- vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code);
- run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+ vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code);
+ run = vcpu->run;
while (1) {
- rc = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
+ vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id);
- TEST_ASSERT(rc == 0, "vcpu_run failed: %d\n", rc);
TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO,
"Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n",
run->exit_reason,
exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
- switch (get_ucall(vm, VCPU_ID, &uc)) {
+ switch (get_ucall(vm, vcpu->id, &uc)) {
case UCALL_SYNC:
/* emulate hypervisor clearing CR4.OSXSAVE */
- vcpu_sregs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, &sregs);
+ vcpu_sregs_get(vm, vcpu->id, &sregs);
sregs.cr4 &= ~X86_CR4_OSXSAVE;
- vcpu_sregs_set(vm, VCPU_ID, &sregs);
+ vcpu_sregs_set(vm, vcpu->id, &sregs);
break;
case UCALL_ABORT:
TEST_FAIL("Guest CR4 bit (OSXSAVE) unsynchronized with CPUID bit.");
--
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists