[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220603034627.GB41034@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 11:46:27 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, hi@...ssa.is,
irogers@...gle.com, likexu@...cent.com, kjain@...ux.ibm.com,
lihuafei1@...wei.com, adam.li@...erecomputing.com,
german.gomez@....com, james.clark@....com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] perf c2c: Support display for Arm64
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:11:20PM +0000, Ali Saidi wrote:
[...]
> > You are welcome! And very appreicate your helping to mature the code.
>
> Seconding that, thanks for progressing this so much Leo.
You are very welcome, Ali!
> > > I'll assume someone else is reviewing your code changes.
> >
> > Yeah, let's give a bit more time for reviewing.
>
> I've tested and given each patch a close look. I haven't found anything that
> looks to change other architectures and the output on my Graviton systems looks
> great. I pulled in your patch to add physical addresses to the spe records and
> as expected I saw the Node properly populated and PA cnt is no longer zero. One
> nit is the documentation still says that "Total HITMs (tot) as default," while
> the code now defaults to "peer" on arm64. Other than that:
>
> Tested-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>
Thanks a lot for the testing. Will respin a new patch set for
correcting the documentation:
"Total HITMs (tot) as default, except Arm64 uses peer mode as default".
And will add your test and review tags.
Thanks,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists