linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: PCI: xilinx-cpm: Fix reg property order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Jun 2022 04:52:18 +0000
From:   Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@...inx.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
        "lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: PCI: xilinx-cpm: Fix reg property order

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: PCI: xilinx-cpm: Fix reg property order
> 
> On Mon, 16 May 2022 15:52:17 +0530, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > All existing vendor DTSes are using "cpm_slcr" reg followed by "cfg" reg.
> >
> > This order is also suggested by node name which is pcie@...10000 which
> > suggests that cpm_slcr register should be the first.
> >
> > Driver itself is using devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname() for
> > both names that's why there is no functional change even on
> > description which are using current order.
> >
> > But still prefer to change order to cover currently used description.
> > Fixes: e22fadb1d014 ("PCI: xilinx-cpm: Add YAML schemas for Versal CPM
> > Root Port")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-versal-cpm.yaml     | 10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> Applied, thanks!

Thanks Rob.