linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/sun4i: sun8i: Add the ability to keep scaler enabled for VI layer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Jun 2022 11:57:35 +0300
From:   Roman Stratiienko <r.stratiienko@...il.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc:     wens@...e.org,
        Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        airlied@...ux.ie, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, megi@....cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sun4i: sun8i: Add the ability to keep scaler enabled
 for VI layer

Hi Maxime,

пт, 3 июн. 2022 г. в 11:24, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 06:01:18PM +0000, Roman Stratiienko wrote:
> > According to DE2.0/DE3.0 manual VI scaler enable register is double
> > buffered, but de facto it doesn't, or the hardware has the shadow
> > register latching issues which causes single-frame picture corruption
> > after changing the state of scaler enable register.
> >
> > Allow the user to keep the scaler always enabled, preventing the UI
> > glitches on the transition from scaled to unscaled state.
> >
> > NOTE:
> > UI layer scaler has more registers with double-buffering issue and can't
> > be workarounded in the same manner.
> >
> > You may find a python test and a demo video for this issue at [1]
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/GloDroid/glodroid_tests/issues/4
>
> Please describe the issue entirely here. The commit log must be self-sufficient.

Commit message already states "single-frame picture corruption after
changing the state of scaler enable register", therefore I find it
already self-sufficient

Also I find demo videos and link to tests useful for the followers to
go further with investigation.

If you have something specific in mind when asking to enhance the
commit message please say it.

>
> > Signed-off-by: Roman Stratiienko <r.stratiienko@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c    | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_vi_layer.c |  4 +++-
> >  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c
> > index 71ab0a00b4de..15cad0330f66 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,18 @@
> >  #include "sun8i_vi_layer.h"
> >  #include "sunxi_engine.h"
> >
> > +/* According to DE2.0/DE3.0 manual VI scaler enable register is double
> > + * buffered, but de facto it doesn't, or the hardware has the shadow
> > + * register latching issues which causes single-frame picture corruption
> > + * after changing the state of scaler enable register.
> > + * Allow the user to keep the scaler always enabled, preventing the UI
> > + * glitches on the transition from scaled to unscaled state.
> > + */
> > +int sun8i_vi_keep_scaler_enabled;
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(keep_vi_scaler_enabled,
> > +              "Keep VI scaler enabled (1 = enabled, 0 = disabled (default))");
> > +module_param_named(keep_vi_scaler_enabled, sun8i_vi_keep_scaler_enabled, int, 0644);
> > +
>
> It's not clear to me why we would want to make that a parameter?
>
>1 If it never works, we should fix it once and for all and not allow a broken setup at all.

It's a hardware issue and can be fixed only within the hardware.

Current patch is a workaround that if enabled can cause increased
power consumption
for existing users. Therefore I think it is better to give existing
distro-maintainers a chance to test it prior to delivery.

Also I do not have all the sunxi SOCs to test it. My tests were
limited only by A64 and H6 SOCs.

> Maxime

Best regards,
Roman