linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 4/7] mm/demotion/dax/kmem: Set node's memory tier to MEMORY_TIER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c98eb873-a5bb-edcc-743d-89cfffe52cd9@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Jun 2022 14:34:31 +0530
From:   Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
        Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@...il.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@...wei.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 4/7] mm/demotion/dax/kmem: Set node's memory tier
 to MEMORY_TIER_PMEM

On 6/2/22 12:06 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On 6/1/2022 7:19 PM, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote:
>> On 6/1/22 11:59 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>>> I was experimenting with this patchset and found this behaviour.
>>> Here's what I did:
>>>
>>> Boot a KVM guest with vNVDIMM device which ends up with device_dax
>>> driver by default.
>>>
>>> Use it as RAM by binding it to dax kmem driver. It now appears as
>>> RAM with a new NUMA node that is put to memtier1 (the existing tier
>>> where DRAM already exists)
>>>
>>
>> That should have placed it in memtier2.
>>
>>> I can move it to memtier2 (MEMORY_RANK_PMEM) manually, but isn't
>>> that expected to happen automatically when a node with dax kmem
>>> device comes up?
>>>
>>
>> This can happen if we have added the same NUMA node to memtier1 before dax kmem driver initialized the pmem memory. Can you check before the above node_set_memory_tier_rank() whether the specific NUMA node is already part of any memory tier?
> 
> When we reach node_set_memory_tier_rank(), node1 (that has the pmem device)
> is already part of memtier1 whose nodelist shows 0-1.
> 

can you find out which code path added node1 to memtier1? Do you have 
regular memory also appearing on node1?

-aneesh