[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220603004331.1523888-58-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 00:42:04 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 057/144] KVM: selftests: Convert mmu_role_test away from VCPU_ID
Convert mmu_role_test to use vm_create_with_one_vcpu() and pass around
a 'struct kvm_vcpu' object instead of using a global VCPU_ID.
Note, this is a "functional" change in the sense that the test now
creates a vCPU with vcpu_id==0 instead of vcpu_id==1. The non-zero
VCPU_ID was 100% arbitrary and added little to no validation coverage.
If testing non-zero vCPU IDs is desirable for generic tests, that can be
done in the future by tweaking the VM creation helpers.
Opportunistically use vcpu_run() instead of _vcpu_run() plus an open
coded assert that KVM_RUN succeeded.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/x86_64/mmu_role_test.c | 20 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/mmu_role_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/mmu_role_test.c
index da2325fcad87..809aa0153cee 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/mmu_role_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/mmu_role_test.c
@@ -3,8 +3,6 @@
#include "kvm_util.h"
#include "processor.h"
-#define VCPU_ID 1
-
#define MMIO_GPA 0x100000000ull
static void guest_code(void)
@@ -25,22 +23,21 @@ static void guest_pf_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
static void mmu_role_test(u32 *cpuid_reg, u32 evil_cpuid_val)
{
u32 good_cpuid_val = *cpuid_reg;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_run *run;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
uint64_t cmd;
- int r;
/* Create VM */
- vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code);
- run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+ vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code);
+ run = vcpu->run;
/* Map 1gb page without a backing memlot. */
__virt_pg_map(vm, MMIO_GPA, MMIO_GPA, X86_PAGE_SIZE_1G);
- r = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
+ vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id);
/* Guest access to the 1gb page should trigger MMIO. */
- TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "vcpu_run failed: %d\n", r);
TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO,
"Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s), expected MMIO exit (1gb page w/o memslot)\n",
run->exit_reason, exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
@@ -57,7 +54,7 @@ static void mmu_role_test(u32 *cpuid_reg, u32 evil_cpuid_val)
* returns the struct that contains the entry being modified. Eww.
*/
*cpuid_reg = evil_cpuid_val;
- vcpu_set_cpuid(vm, VCPU_ID, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
+ vcpu_set_cpuid(vm, vcpu->id, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
/*
* Add a dummy memslot to coerce KVM into bumping the MMIO generation.
@@ -70,13 +67,12 @@ static void mmu_role_test(u32 *cpuid_reg, u32 evil_cpuid_val)
/* Set up a #PF handler to eat the RSVD #PF and signal all done! */
vm_init_descriptor_tables(vm);
- vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vm, VCPU_ID);
+ vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vm, vcpu->id);
vm_install_exception_handler(vm, PF_VECTOR, guest_pf_handler);
- r = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
- TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "vcpu_run failed: %d\n", r);
+ vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id);
- cmd = get_ucall(vm, VCPU_ID, NULL);
+ cmd = get_ucall(vm, vcpu->id, NULL);
TEST_ASSERT(cmd == UCALL_DONE,
"Unexpected guest exit, exit_reason=%s, ucall.cmd = %lu\n",
exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason), cmd);
--
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists