lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 03 Jun 2022 13:28:56 +0200
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com
Cc:     james.schulman@...rus.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david.rhodes@...rus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fixup Cirrus SX control usage

On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 17:21:13 +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Mostly the usage of the SX controls seems to match the lowest gain
> value + number of gain levels expected. The one notable exception
> there being cs53l30 as David noted. However, there are a couple of
> other places where the minimum value/TLVs are slightly incorrectly
> specified.
> 
> There are two I couldn't quite work out yet, any input on these
> greatly appreciated:
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   broonie/sound.git for-linus

Thanks!

[1/6] ASoC: cs42l52: Fix TLV scales for mixer controls
      commit: 8bf5aabf524eec61013e506f764a0b2652dc5665
[2/6] ASoC: cs35l36: Update digital volume TLV
      commit: 5005a2345825eb8346546d99bfe669f73111b5c5
[3/6] ASoC: cs53l30: Correct number of volume levels on SX controls
      commit: 7fbd6dd68127927e844912a16741016d432a0737
[4/6] ASoC: cs42l52: Correct TLV for Bypass Volume
      commit: 91e90c712fade0b69cdff7cc6512f6099bd18ae5
[5/6] ASoC: cs42l56: Correct typo in minimum level for SX volume controls
      commit: a8928ada9b96944cadd8b65d191e33199fd38782
[6/6] ASoC: cs42l51: Correct minimum value for SX volume control
      commit: fcb3b5a58926d16d9a338841b74af06d4c29be15

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ