[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ypo6Q8/SuPGxp/ac@google.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 09:43:47 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Hansson <newbie13xd@...il.com>,
Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: input: gpio-keys: document label
and autorepeat properties
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 12:16:01PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The original text bindings documented "autorepeat" and "label"
> properties (in the device node, beside the nodes with keys).
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.yaml | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.yaml
> index 49d388dc8d78..b1c910a5e233 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.yaml
> @@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ properties:
> - gpio-keys
> - gpio-keys-polled
>
> + autorepeat:
> + type: boolean
> + description:
> + Enable operating system (not hardware) key auto repeat feature.
Should we refer to the generic input device property here instead (one
on described in input.yaml)?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists