[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220603004331.1523888-121-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 00:43:07 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 120/144] KVM: selftests: Convert tprot away from VCPU_ID
Convert tprot to use vm_create_with_vcpus() and pass around a
'struct kvm_vcpu' object instead of passing around vCPU IDs. Note, this is
a "functional" change in the sense that the test now creates a vCPU with
vcpu_id==0 instead of vcpu_id==1. The non-zero VCPU_ID was 100% arbitrary
and added little to no validation coverage. If testing non-zero vCPU IDs
is desirable for generic tests, that can be done in the future by tweaking
the VM creation helpers.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c | 25 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c
index c097b9db495e..4caa77388033 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c
@@ -14,8 +14,6 @@
#define CR0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE (1UL << (63 - 38))
#define CR0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE (1UL << (63 - 39))
-#define VCPU_ID 1
-
static __aligned(PAGE_SIZE) uint8_t pages[2][PAGE_SIZE];
static uint8_t *const page_store_prot = pages[0];
static uint8_t *const page_fetch_prot = pages[1];
@@ -182,14 +180,14 @@ static void guest_code(void)
GUEST_SYNC(perform_next_stage(&i, mapped_0));
}
-#define HOST_SYNC(vmp, stage) \
+#define HOST_SYNC(vcpup, stage) \
({ \
- struct kvm_vm *__vm = (vmp); \
+ struct kvm_vcpu *__vcpu = (vcpup); \
struct ucall uc; \
int __stage = (stage); \
\
- vcpu_run(__vm, VCPU_ID); \
- get_ucall(__vm, VCPU_ID, &uc); \
+ vcpu_run(__vcpu->vm, __vcpu->id); \
+ get_ucall(__vcpu->vm, __vcpu->id, &uc); \
if (uc.cmd == UCALL_ABORT) { \
TEST_FAIL("line %lu: %s, hints: %lu, %lu", uc.args[1], \
(const char *)uc.args[0], uc.args[2], uc.args[3]); \
@@ -200,28 +198,29 @@ static void guest_code(void)
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct kvm_run *run;
vm_vaddr_t guest_0_page;
- vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code);
- run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+ vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code);
+ run = vcpu->run;
- HOST_SYNC(vm, STAGE_INIT_SIMPLE);
+ HOST_SYNC(vcpu, STAGE_INIT_SIMPLE);
mprotect(addr_gva2hva(vm, (vm_vaddr_t)pages), PAGE_SIZE * 2, PROT_READ);
- HOST_SYNC(vm, TEST_SIMPLE);
+ HOST_SYNC(vcpu, TEST_SIMPLE);
guest_0_page = vm_vaddr_alloc(vm, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
if (guest_0_page != 0)
print_skip("Did not allocate page at 0 for fetch protection override tests");
- HOST_SYNC(vm, STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE);
+ HOST_SYNC(vcpu, STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE);
if (guest_0_page == 0)
mprotect(addr_gva2hva(vm, (vm_vaddr_t)0), PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ);
run->s.regs.crs[0] |= CR0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE;
run->kvm_dirty_regs = KVM_SYNC_CRS;
- HOST_SYNC(vm, TEST_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE);
+ HOST_SYNC(vcpu, TEST_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE);
run->s.regs.crs[0] |= CR0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE;
run->kvm_dirty_regs = KVM_SYNC_CRS;
- HOST_SYNC(vm, TEST_STORAGE_PROT_OVERRIDE);
+ HOST_SYNC(vcpu, TEST_STORAGE_PROT_OVERRIDE);
}
--
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists