linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 22/53] exfat: check if cluster num is valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220603173819.370000347@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri,  3 Jun 2022 19:43:07 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+a4087e40b9c13aad7892@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>,
        Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
        Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 22/53] exfat: check if cluster num is valid

From: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>

commit 64ba4b15e5c045f8b746c6da5fc9be9a6b00b61d upstream.

Syzbot reported slab-out-of-bounds read in exfat_clear_bitmap.
This was triggered by reproducer calling truncute with size 0,
which causes the following trace:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in exfat_clear_bitmap+0x147/0x490 fs/exfat/balloc.c:174
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888115aa9508 by task syz-executor251/365

Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1e2/0x24b lib/dump_stack.c:118
 print_address_description+0x81/0x3c0 mm/kasan/report.c:233
 __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:419 [inline]
 kasan_report+0x1a4/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:436
 __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/report_generic.c:309
 exfat_clear_bitmap+0x147/0x490 fs/exfat/balloc.c:174
 exfat_free_cluster+0x25a/0x4a0 fs/exfat/fatent.c:181
 __exfat_truncate+0x99e/0xe00 fs/exfat/file.c:217
 exfat_truncate+0x11b/0x4f0 fs/exfat/file.c:243
 exfat_setattr+0xa03/0xd40 fs/exfat/file.c:339
 notify_change+0xb76/0xe10 fs/attr.c:336
 do_truncate+0x1ea/0x2d0 fs/open.c:65

Move the is_valid_cluster() helper from fatent.c to a common
header to make it reusable in other *.c files. And add is_valid_cluster()
to validate if cluster number is within valid range in exfat_clear_bitmap()
and exfat_set_bitmap().

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=50381fc73821ecae743b8cf24b4c9a04776f767c
Reported-by: syzbot+a4087e40b9c13aad7892@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 1e49a94cf707 ("exfat: add bitmap operations")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.7+
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/exfat/balloc.c   |    8 ++++++--
 fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h |    8 ++++++++
 fs/exfat/fatent.c   |    8 --------
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/exfat/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/balloc.c
@@ -148,7 +148,9 @@ int exfat_set_bitmap(struct inode *inode
 	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
 	struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
 
-	WARN_ON(clu < EXFAT_FIRST_CLUSTER);
+	if (!is_valid_cluster(sbi, clu))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	ent_idx = CLUSTER_TO_BITMAP_ENT(clu);
 	i = BITMAP_OFFSET_SECTOR_INDEX(sb, ent_idx);
 	b = BITMAP_OFFSET_BIT_IN_SECTOR(sb, ent_idx);
@@ -166,7 +168,9 @@ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *in
 	struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
 	struct exfat_mount_options *opts = &sbi->options;
 
-	WARN_ON(clu < EXFAT_FIRST_CLUSTER);
+	if (!is_valid_cluster(sbi, clu))
+		return;
+
 	ent_idx = CLUSTER_TO_BITMAP_ENT(clu);
 	i = BITMAP_OFFSET_SECTOR_INDEX(sb, ent_idx);
 	b = BITMAP_OFFSET_BIT_IN_SECTOR(sb, ent_idx);
--- a/fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h
+++ b/fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h
@@ -380,6 +380,14 @@ static inline int exfat_sector_to_cluste
 		EXFAT_RESERVED_CLUSTERS;
 }
 
+static inline bool is_valid_cluster(struct exfat_sb_info *sbi,
+		unsigned int clus)
+{
+	if (clus < EXFAT_FIRST_CLUSTER || sbi->num_clusters <= clus)
+		return false;
+	return true;
+}
+
 /* super.c */
 int exfat_set_volume_dirty(struct super_block *sb);
 int exfat_clear_volume_dirty(struct super_block *sb);
--- a/fs/exfat/fatent.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/fatent.c
@@ -81,14 +81,6 @@ int exfat_ent_set(struct super_block *sb
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline bool is_valid_cluster(struct exfat_sb_info *sbi,
-		unsigned int clus)
-{
-	if (clus < EXFAT_FIRST_CLUSTER || sbi->num_clusters <= clus)
-		return false;
-	return true;
-}
-
 int exfat_ent_get(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int loc,
 		unsigned int *content)
 {