[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01dd74cb-b53c-93e3-d27f-57603d348f67@flygoat.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 14:46:30 +0100
From: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.19 1/2] irqchip/loongson-liointc: Use architecture
register to get coreid
在 2022/6/4 14:18, Huacai Chen 写道:
> Hi, Jiaxun,
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 8:41 PM Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com> wrote:
>> fa84f89395e0 ("irqchip/loongson-liointc: Fix build error for
>> LoongArch") replaced get_ebase_cpunum with physical processor
>> id from SMP facilities. However that breaks MIPS non-SMP build
>> and makes booting from other cores inpossible on non-SMP kernel.
>>
>> Thus we revert get_ebase_cpunum back and use get_csr_cpuid for
>> LoongArch.
>>
>> Fixes: fa84f89395e0 ("irqchip/loongson-liointc: Fix build error for LoongArch")
>> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c
>> index aed88857d90f..c11cf97bcd1a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,14 @@
>>
>> #define LIOINTC_ERRATA_IRQ 10
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MIPS)
>> +#define liointc_core_id get_ebase_cpunum()
>> +#elif defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
>> +#define liointc_core_id get_csr_cpuid()
>> +#else
>> +#define liointc_core_id 0
>> +#endif
> Thank you for your quick fix. But I think it is better to do like this:
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
> #define liointc_core_id get_csr_cpuid()
> #else
> #define liointc_core_id get_ebase_cpunum()
> #endif
>
> Because this driver doesn't depend on COMPILE_TEST, it can only be
> built under MIPS and LOONGARCH. Moreover, let the else branch be the
> same as the old behavior looks more reasonable.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Will do for v2.
- Jiaxun
>
> Huacai
>
>> +
>> struct liointc_handler_data {
>> struct liointc_priv *priv;
>> u32 parent_int_map;
>> @@ -57,7 +65,7 @@ static void liointc_chained_handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> struct liointc_handler_data *handler = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
>> struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>> struct irq_chip_generic *gc = handler->priv->gc;
>> - int core = cpu_logical_map(smp_processor_id()) % LIOINTC_NUM_CORES;
>> + int core = liointc_core_id % LIOINTC_NUM_CORES;
>> u32 pending;
>>
>> chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists