[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9fe80bd8-7733-066e-d8eb-5e5bab221e45@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 22:47:48 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] blk-cgroup: Correctly free percpu iostat_cpu in
blkg on error exit
On 6/3/22 22:08, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 03:20:18PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> Commit f73316482977 ("blk-cgroup: reimplement basic IO stats using cgroup
>> rstat") changes block cgroup IO stats to use the rstat APIs. It added
>> a new percpu iostat_cpu field into blkg. The blkg_alloc() was modified
>> to allocate the new percpu iostat_cpu but didn't free it when an error
>> happened. Fix this by freeing the percpu iostat_cpu on error exit.
>>
>> Fixes: f73316482977 ("blk-cgroup: reimplement basic IO stats using cgroup rstat")
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> block/blk-cgroup.c | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
>> index 40161a3f68d0..acd9b0aa8dc8 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
>> @@ -219,11 +219,11 @@ static struct blkcg_gq *blkg_alloc(struct blkcg *blkcg, struct request_queue *q,
>> return NULL;
>>
>> if (percpu_ref_init(&blkg->refcnt, blkg_release, 0, gfp_mask))
>> - goto err_free;
>> + goto err_free_blkg;
>>
>> blkg->iostat_cpu = alloc_percpu_gfp(struct blkg_iostat_set, gfp_mask);
>> if (!blkg->iostat_cpu)
>> - goto err_free;
>> + goto err_free_blkg;
>>
>> if (!blk_get_queue(q))
>> goto err_free;
>> @@ -259,6 +259,9 @@ static struct blkcg_gq *blkg_alloc(struct blkcg *blkcg, struct request_queue *q,
>> return blkg;
>>
>> err_free:
>> + free_percpu(blkg->iostat_cpu);
>> +
>> +err_free_blkg:
>> blkg_free(blkg);
> Hi Waiman,
>
> But blkg_free() frees blkg->iostat_cpu via blkg_free_workfn(), so I am
> confused where the leak is in failure path?
Yes, you are right. I have overlooked that. So this patch isn't really
necessary. Thanks for correcting me.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists