linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] openrisc/mm: Enable ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fe3d0b2b-ebfb-0d95-d79b-632d7ed88959@arm.com>
Date:   Sun, 5 Jun 2022 15:18:35 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] openrisc/mm: Enable ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT



On 6/5/22 11:37, Stafford Horne wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 03:44:11PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This defines and exports a platform specific custom vm_get_page_prot() via
>> subscribing ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT. Subsequently all __SXXX and __PXXX
>> macros can be dropped which are no longer needed.
>>
>> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
>> Cc: openrisc@...ts.librecores.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> 
> Is it possible to retract my Acked-by?  I was following the discussion of this
> new function actually being sub optimal.  So as far as I am concerned all these
> architecture patches should be nak'ed.

Sure, alright. I am planning to redo these arch patches via making
the protection_map[] array private to the platforms but possibly
with a common look up function as Christophe had suggested earlier.