linux-kernel - [PATCH MANUALSEL 4.9 3/3] x86/PCI: Add PIRQ routing table range checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220605135547.61902-3-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun,  5 Jun 2022 09:55:45 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH MANUALSEL 4.9 3/3] x86/PCI: Add PIRQ routing table range checks

From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>

[ Upstream commit 5d64089aa4a5bd3d7e00e3d6ddf4943dd34627b3 ]

Verify that the PCI IRQ Routing Table header as well as individual slot
entries are all wholly contained within the BIOS memory area.  Do not
even call the checksum calculator if the header would overrun the area
and then bail out early if any slot would.

Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@...am.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.2203301735510.22465@angie.orcam.me.uk
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/pci/irq.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/irq.c b/arch/x86/pci/irq.c
index 5f0e596b0519..9921e33111bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/irq.c
@@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ void (*pcibios_disable_irq)(struct pci_dev *dev) = pirq_disable_irq;
  *  and perform checksum verification.
  */
 
-static inline struct irq_routing_table *pirq_check_routing_table(u8 *addr)
+static inline struct irq_routing_table *pirq_check_routing_table(u8 *addr,
+								 u8 *limit)
 {
 	struct irq_routing_table *rt;
 	int i;
@@ -71,7 +72,8 @@ static inline struct irq_routing_table *pirq_check_routing_table(u8 *addr)
 	if (rt->signature != PIRQ_SIGNATURE ||
 	    rt->version != PIRQ_VERSION ||
 	    rt->size % 16 ||
-	    rt->size < sizeof(struct irq_routing_table))
+	    rt->size < sizeof(struct irq_routing_table) ||
+	    (limit && rt->size > limit - addr))
 		return NULL;
 	sum = 0;
 	for (i = 0; i < rt->size; i++)
@@ -92,17 +94,22 @@ static inline struct irq_routing_table *pirq_check_routing_table(u8 *addr)
 
 static struct irq_routing_table * __init pirq_find_routing_table(void)
 {
+	u8 * const bios_start = (u8 *)__va(0xf0000);
+	u8 * const bios_end = (u8 *)__va(0x100000);
 	u8 *addr;
 	struct irq_routing_table *rt;
 
 	if (pirq_table_addr) {
-		rt = pirq_check_routing_table((u8 *) __va(pirq_table_addr));
+		rt = pirq_check_routing_table((u8 *)__va(pirq_table_addr),
+					      NULL);
 		if (rt)
 			return rt;
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "PCI: PIRQ table NOT found at pirqaddr\n");
 	}
-	for (addr = (u8 *) __va(0xf0000); addr < (u8 *) __va(0x100000); addr += 16) {
-		rt = pirq_check_routing_table(addr);
+	for (addr = bios_start;
+	     addr < bios_end - sizeof(struct irq_routing_table);
+	     addr += 16) {
+		rt = pirq_check_routing_table(addr, bios_end);
 		if (rt)
 			return rt;
 	}
-- 
2.35.1