linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: input: gpio-keys: document label and autorepeat properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 5 Jun 2022 17:15:00 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Stefan Hansson <newbie13xd@...il.com>,
        Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: input: gpio-keys: document label and
 autorepeat properties

On 03/06/2022 18:43, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 12:16:01PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The original text bindings documented "autorepeat" and "label"
>> properties (in the device node, beside the nodes with keys).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.yaml | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.yaml
>> index 49d388dc8d78..b1c910a5e233 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.yaml
>> @@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ properties:
>>        - gpio-keys
>>        - gpio-keys-polled
>>  
>> +  autorepeat:
>> +    type: boolean
>> +    description:
>> +      Enable operating system (not hardware) key auto repeat feature.
> 
> Should we refer to the generic input device property here instead (one
> on described in input.yaml)?

You mean copy the description from input.yaml or say something like:
"see input.yaml"?


Best regards,
Krzysztof