[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220605064342.309219-3-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 14:43:32 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Rename kvm_unlink_unsync_page() to kvm_mmu_page_clear_unsync()
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>
"Unlink" is ambiguous, the function does not disconnect any link.
Use "clear" instead which is an antonym of "mark" in the name of the
function mark_unsync() or kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync().
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index f61416818116..c20981dfc4fd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1825,7 +1825,7 @@ static int mmu_unsync_walk(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
return __mmu_unsync_walk(sp, pvec);
}
-static void kvm_unlink_unsync_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+static void kvm_mmu_page_clear_unsync(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
WARN_ON(!sp->unsync);
trace_kvm_mmu_sync_page(sp);
@@ -1987,7 +1987,7 @@ static int mmu_sync_children(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
}
for_each_sp(pages, sp, parents, i) {
- kvm_unlink_unsync_page(vcpu->kvm, sp);
+ kvm_mmu_page_clear_unsync(vcpu->kvm, sp);
flush |= kvm_sync_page(vcpu, sp, &invalid_list) > 0;
mmu_pages_clear_parents(&parents);
}
@@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@ static bool __kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
unaccount_shadowed(kvm, sp);
if (sp->unsync)
- kvm_unlink_unsync_page(kvm, sp);
+ kvm_mmu_page_clear_unsync(kvm, sp);
if (!sp->root_count) {
/* Count self */
(*nr_zapped)++;
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists