[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 09:11:57 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <willy@...radead.org>, <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
<axboe@...nel.dk>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm/filemap: fix that first page is not mark
accessed in filemap_read()
On 2022/06/03 2:22, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 16:21:29 +0800 Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> In filemap_read(), 'ra->prev_pos' is set to 'iocb->ki_pos + copied',
>> while it should be 'iocb->ki_ops'. For consequence,
>> folio_mark_accessed() will not be called for 'fbatch.folios[0]' since
>> 'iocb->ki_pos' is always equal to 'ra->prev_pos'.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/filemap.c
>> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
>> @@ -2728,10 +2728,11 @@ ssize_t filemap_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
>> flush_dcache_folio(folio);
>>
>> copied = copy_folio_to_iter(folio, offset, bytes, iter);
>> -
>> - already_read += copied;
>> - iocb->ki_pos += copied;
>> - ra->prev_pos = iocb->ki_pos;
>> + if (copied) {
>> + ra->prev_pos = iocb->ki_pos;
>> + already_read += copied;
>> + iocb->ki_pos += copied;
>> + }
>>
>> if (copied < bytes) {
>> error = -EFAULT;
>
> It seems tidier, but does it matter? If copied==0 we're going to break
> out and return -EFAULT anyway?
Hi,
Please notice that I set 'prev_ops' to 'ki_pos' first here, instead of
'ki_pos + copied'.
Thanks,
Kuai
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists