[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 14:33:38 +0200
From: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>
To: Anton Makarov <am@...alliance.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david.lebrun@...ouvain.be,
regressions@...ts.linux.dev, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>,
Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@...roma2.it>,
Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahabdels.dev@...il.com>,
Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] net: SRv6 End.DT6 function is broken in VRF mode
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 15:23:26 +0300
Anton Makarov <am@...alliance.com> wrote:
> #regzbot introduced: b9132c32e01976686efa26252cc246944a0d2cab
>
> Hi All!
>
> Seems there is a regression of SRv6 End.DT6 function in VRF mode. In the
> following scenario packet is decapsulated successfully on vrf10
> interface but not forwarded to vrf10's slave interface:
>
> ip netns exec r4 ip -6 nexthop add id 1004 encap seg6local action
> End.DT6 vrftable 10 dev vrf10
>
> ip netns exec r4 ip -6 route add fcff:0:4:200:: nhid 1004
>
>
> In End.DT6 legacy mode everything works good:
>
> ip netns exec r4 ip -6 nexthop add id 1004 encap seg6local action
> End.DT6 table 10 dev vrf10
>
> ip netns exec r4 ip -6 route add fcff:0:4:200:: nhid 1004
>
>
> The issue impacts even stable v5.18.1. Please help to fix it.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Anton
>
>
>
Hi Anton,
thank you for reporting this issue. I am already working on a fix patch which I
will send shortly.
Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists