[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 15:51:06 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@...il.com>,
Liang Chen <cl@...k-chips.com>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax BASE protocol sanity checks on protocol list
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:15:59 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Even though malformed replies from firmware must be treated carefully to
> avoid memory corruption Kernel side, some out-of-spec SCMI replies can
> be tolerated to avoid breaking existing deployed system, as long as they
> won't cause memory issues.
>
Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi), thanks!
[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax BASE protocol sanity checks on protocol list
https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/122839b58a
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists