Date:   Mon, 06 Jun 2022 16:41:32 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] irqchip/sifive-plic: Add support for Renesas RZ/Five SoC

On Fri, 27 May 2022 12:05:38 +0100,
"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 6:22 PM Lad Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Renesas RZ/Five SoC has a RISC-V AX45MP AndesCore with NCEPLIC100. The
> > NCEPLIC100 supports both edge-triggered and level-triggered interrupts. In
> > case of edge-triggered interrupts NCEPLIC100 ignores the next interrupt
> > edge until the previous completion message has been received and
> > NCEPLIC100 doesn't support pending interrupt counter, hence losing the
> > interrupts if not acknowledged in time.
> >
> > So the workaround for edge-triggered interrupts to be handled correctly
> > and without losing is that it needs to be acknowledged first and then
> > handler must be run so that we don't miss on the next edge-triggered
> > interrupt.
> >
> > This patch adds a new compatible string for Renesas RZ/Five SoC and adds
> > support to change interrupt flow based on the interrupt type. It also
> > implements irq_ack and irq_set_type callbacks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig           |  1 +
> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> > index f3d071422f3b..aea0e4e7e547 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> > @@ -537,6 +537,7 @@ config SIFIVE_PLIC
> >         bool "SiFive Platform-Level Interrupt Controller"
> >         depends on RISCV
> >         select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
> > +       select IRQ_FASTEOI_HIERARCHY_HANDLERS
> >         help
> >            This enables support for the PLIC chip found in SiFive (and
> >            potentially other) RISC-V systems.  The PLIC controls devices
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > index bb87e4c3b88e..abffce48e69c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > @@ -60,10 +60,13 @@
> >  #define        PLIC_DISABLE_THRESHOLD          0x7
> >  #define        PLIC_ENABLE_THRESHOLD           0
> >
> > +#define RENESAS_R9A07G043_PLIC         1
> > +
> >  struct plic_priv {
> >         struct cpumask lmask;
> >         struct irq_domain *irqdomain;
> >         void __iomem *regs;
> > +       u8 of_data;
> >  };
> >
> >  struct plic_handler {
> > @@ -163,10 +166,31 @@ static int plic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >
> > +static void plic_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > +       struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
> > +
> > +       if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) {
> > +               plic_irq_unmask(d);
> > +               writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> > +               plic_irq_mask(d);
> > +       } else {
> > +               writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> > +       }
> > +}
> > +
> I sometimes still see an interrupt miss!
> 
> As per [0], we first need to claim the interrupt by reading the claim
> register which needs to be done in the ack callback (which should be
> doable) for edge interrupts, but the problem arises in the chained
> handler callback where it does claim the interrupt by reading the
> claim register.
> 
> static void plic_handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> {
>     struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
>     struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>     void __iomem *claim = handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM;
>     irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> 
>     WARN_ON_ONCE(!handler->present);
> 
>     chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> 
>     while ((hwirq = readl(claim))) {
>         int err = generic_handle_domain_irq(handler->priv->irqdomain,
>                             hwirq);
>         if (unlikely(err))
>             pr_warn_ratelimited("can't find mapping for hwirq %lu\n",
>                     hwirq);
>     }
> 
>     chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> }
> 
> I was thinking I would get around by getting the irqdata in
> plic_handle_irq() callback using the irq_desc (struct irq_data *d =
> &desc->irq_data;) and check the d->hwirq but this will be always 9.
> 
>         plic: interrupt-controller@...00000 {
>             compatible = "renesas-r9a07g043-plic";
>             #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>             #address-cells = <0>;
>             riscv,ndev = <543>;
>             interrupt-controller;
>             reg = <0x0 0x12c00000 0 0x400000>;
>             clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A07G043_NCEPLIC_ACLK>;
>             clock-names = "plic100ss";
>             power-domains = <&cpg>;
>             resets = <&cpg R9A07G043_NCEPLIC_ARESETN>;
>             interrupts-extended = <&cpu0_intc 11 &cpu0_intc 9>;
>         };
> 
> Any pointers on how this could be done sanely.

Why doesn't the chained interrupt also get the ack-aware irq_chip?

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists