[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1abaea0d-7e21-b596-eb5d-75217133a504@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 23:00:51 +0800
From: "Huang, Shaoqin" <shaoqin.huang@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
CC: <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86/mmu: Check every prev_roots in
__kvm_mmu_free_obsolete_roots()
Thanks Sean!
On 6/7/2022 12:56 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022, shaoqin.huang@...el.com wrote:
>> From: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@...el.com>
>>
>> When freeing obsolete previous roots, check prev_roots as intended, not
>> the current root.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@...el.com>
>> Fixes: 527d5cd7eece ("KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only obsolete roots if a root shadow page is zapped")
>
> Because KVM patches aren't guaranteed to be backported without it (though it's
> "only" v5.18 that's affected), this needs:
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists