linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: initialize jump labels before setup_machine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25c1a57e-af67-ebc8-ab13-6532bf6e6e75@raspberrypi.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Jun 2022 16:35:32 +0100
From:   Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: initialize jump labels before setup_machine_fdt()

Jason,

On 07/06/2022 16:14, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey again,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:15:27AM +0100, Phil Elwell wrote:
>> On 07/06/2022 09:43, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 10:29 AM Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This patch is fatal for me in the downstream Raspberry Pi kernel - it locks up
>>>> on boot even before the earlycon output is available. Hacking jump_label_init to
>>>> skip the jump_entry for "crng_is_ready" allows it to boot, but is likely to have
>>>> consequences further down the line.
>>>
>>> Also, reading this a few times, I'm not 100% sure I understand what
>>> you did to hack around this and why that works. Think you could paste
>>> your hackpatch just out of interest to the discussion (but obviously
>>> not to be applied)?
>>
>> This is the minimal version of my workaround patch that at least allows the
>> board to boot. Bear in mind that it was written with no previous knowledge of
>> jump labels and was arrived at by iteratively bisecting the list of jump_labels
>> until the first dangerous one was found, then later working out that there was
>> only one.
> 
> Looks like this patch fails due to CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX.
> Investigating deeper now, but that for starters seems to be the
> differentiating factor between my prior test rig and one that reproduces
> the error. I assume your raspi also sets CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX.

Yes, it does, as does multi_v7_defconfig.

Phil